“It could well be that I don’t feel the same thing that you do. I also can’t be reborn. It’s inside of me. And there’s no getting rid of it. The tragedies, the powerful dramas, the sad stories – it’s in my blood, it’s in my life.” This raw confessional, tinged with a mix of defeat but also unapologetic self-awareness, was delivered by George Obadiah during a 1984 conversation with author Ilan Shaul, (an excerpt from the latter’s book, Sea of Tears: War Culture, 2022, featuring rare interviews with the main players in Israel’s Middle Eastern/Mizrahi cultural revolution), almost two years since Obadiah’s last film which ultimately, became the director’s cinematic swansong. This prolific filmmaker’s body of work who, at one point between 1971 – 1982, was directing and producing at least one local firm per year (sometimes two!), adding up to a total of 13; this, on top of an additional 25 films he had directed outside of Israel – earned him a reputation as quite the controversial creator amongst critics and the establishment. Both consistently denied Obadiah any recognition or validation for his work, and towards the end of his days, audiences too who, for him where the main drive behind his filmmaking, also turned their backs on his films.
Obadiah was constantly scouting for scripts. He remained ever eager to deliver and tell stories – and the more, the better. According to Michael Shvili who produced four of his films, Obadiah was notoriously frugal on set: every shot had to be done in one take, and it was exceedingly rare that the crew was asked to reshoot footage that had already been shot (taken from The Israeli Cinema Testimonial Database.) ‘Georgie’ was a craftsman – filmmaking was his craft. He started out as a film distributor in Baghdad, his hometown where he was born 1925, and where he owned a bunch of cinemas. In his twenties, he moved to Tehran – which had one of the most happening film scenes in Asia at the time, not to mention the whole Middle East – where he embarked on a prolific film career. Two years after directing Harbour of Love (1967), an Iranian-Israeli coproduction, Obadiah arrived in Israel – armed with his full set of filmmaking tools and sentimentalist sympathies and set out to recreate his success, in Hebrew. With that in mind, it is only natural that his Israeli debut effort, Ariana (1971) was a remake of one of his earlier Iranian films.
Obadiah’s heartfelt candour in his aforementioned quote echoes the genre with which he became most synonymous, despite not working exclusively within its framework: melodramas. The combination of the genre’s most distinct features: a drama of heightened emotions with a soundtrack that narrates the characters’ extreme woes and inner turmoils became a trademark not just in classical Hollywood films but mostly in nonwestern film industries, e.g., Turkish and Egyptian film and of course, the telenovela – the Latin American TV equivalent. Obadiah, himself, was the genre’s local ambassador and in a way, also the pioneer of Israeli melodramas. As such, the titles of his films – Ariana (1971), Nurit (1972), Sarit (1974), Midnight Entertainer (1977), West Side Girl (1979), and Nurit (1982) – all suggest a distinct connection to the world of women. These permanently distressed damsels – whether facing romantic, familial, physical, professional, or class struggles – are beholden to forces far greater than them and are looking for some kind of respite, usually through song, under the canopy of love.
The aesthetic in Obadiah films tends to play second fiddle to the storyline: many frame compositions, despite their wholesomeness and sheer wealth of detail, do come across as random. The editing too, is not as precise or meticulous as it could be, nor does it seem to show any particular regard for continuity between the current shot and predecessor, at times even shrugging off any sync issues with the soundtrack. What his films are really after is empathy and relatability: and any technical and artistic resources Obadiah has in his arsenal are ultimately there to serve that dramatic end goal. Like his storylines, Obadiah’s filmmaking style can also be described as exaggerated and over-the-top: from low camera angles to heighten the contrast between good and bad to smash cuts to closeups of faces riddled with suffering for greater dramatic effect, and a truly bizarre acting philosophy that endorses delivering soliloquies to an imaginary point just outside the frame – thereby echoing the pathos of the words spoken.
Whether as testimony to his versatility or simple lack of choice, the majority of Obadiah’s earlier films weren’t so much working-class melodramas but rather nods to the other end of popular film, i.e. comedies of errors and identity ‘switcheroos.’ His films Fishke Goes to War (1971) and Nahtche and the General (1972) are both built on common tropes often seen in farces and folktales, with a whole bunch of slapstick peppered in for good measure; however, their adherence to the Israel’s early 1970s distinct national, or rather nationalist climate is unmistakable, including the IDF’s be-all end-all sacrosanct status in society and the crisis of masculinity – all themes that often recurred in war dramas and the New Sensitivity’s intimate films; two of Israeli film’s most common genres at the time.
However, through the practically exclamatory patriotism of his early works, in his subsequent films Obadiah, bit by bit, began stripping the Israeli playing field of all its typical markers and iconography because after all, what he was always most interested in was a universal exploration of humankind. This trend is noticeable once taking in the geographical aspect of his films that are usually set in ‘nonplaces’ – unmarked territories and areas that are neither developed nor regulated; a peripheral space in a classist sense, as opposed to an ethnic one. Even known settings such as Tiberias (in Nurit), posh north Tel Aviv (in 1974’s Day of Judgement, and also Sarit and West Side Girl), and mostly Jaffa (Street 60, 1976; Ariana, and West Side Girl), somehow seem out of place and exterritorial, thereby unburdening these sites of their familiar load in order to fashion Obadiah’s alternate universe in which the universal has taken over for the local.
Another alternative to the then-prevalent mood in Israeli film is the product of Obadiah’s approach to soundtrack. Here too, distinct influences of Egyptian and Turkish film are easily recognisable. Obadiah’s cultural (and ethnic) heritage peers out of every musical choice and the way it is used – from classical Arab music to Greek music, and even Israeli ‘Middle Eastern/Mizrahi’ music in its nascent years (esteemed Israeli singer-songwriter Ahuva Ozeri has a musical cameo in Street 60 where she both sings and plays) – all of that, coupled with local pop music which, at the time, was still taking its baby steps alongside Israeli folk and rock music. Beyond the catchy hooks and the novel use of electronic technology, the new sound had a distinct air of ‘someplace else’ about it, and a connection with the international. Pop’s foreignness was also evident in the overall stylising and colourfulness of the world of popular music which suggests financial affluence – an idyllic resolution to Obadiah’s films in which wealth and happiness blissfully coexist.
In his films, Obadiah used success in the music business as a way of climbing up the social ladder and indeed, it is the big hit single or tune that eventually lead the protagonists to their happy ending. Like his fictional heroes and heroines who manage to tap into their inner voice to find respite from their suffering, Obadiah too turns to art in order to garner sympathy. Many of his peers who had worked with him recall that on more than one occasion, he was seen dabbing a tear on set, overcome with emotion – yet another anecdote that joins all the otherness and foreignness that have come to define his body of work in Israeli film culture. In Obadiah’s world, both men and women cry – at any and all hours of the day.
Throughout his whole career, George Obadiah stayed true to his language which speaks to, and of our most fundamental, human urges in the most direct, unfiltered way. I picked up on this mode of directness in a small, recurring gesture in the majority of his films: with everything going on and still well within the perimeters of the fictional world, suddenly and completely out of the blue, one of the characters will turn their head to face the camera directly, thereby breaking the fourth wall. “Tonight, I’m having everyone round for kibbeh,” actor Arieh Elias’s character says in Nurit, whilst looking directly at us, cheeky grin all over his face. Then in Midnight Entertainer, Tiki (Tikva) Dayan winks at the camera, sharing a coy secret with us.
Whilst these films are very raw, formulaic, and supposedly predictable to the extreme, I daresay that whenever watching them, one will find at least one dazzling, surprising, and highly extraordinary moment. Whether such moments were made in good or bad taste is a fundamental question that equally hangs over Obadiah’s oeuvre – who, echoing David Perlov (in his brilliant, foreshadowing 1974 article, Levantinism? Why Not?) I consider to be Israel’s first Levantine filmmaker. After all, Perlov’s got a point.
I have put together 15 clips for this collection that provide precious insight into George Obadiah’s style and legacy. I invite you to strap in and prepare to experience all the emotional upheaval, bottomless pits of despair, and highest echelons of joy along the trajectory which Obadiah never ceased to travel.
Please be advised that every clip is accompanied by a short introductory text below.